HKS SQV blow off valve

Simon

據聞呢種差壓嘩佬, 可以有兩種却壓力量, 唔會一收油走晒所有壓力.
http://www.hksusa.com/products/?id=3261




http://www.hksusa.com/content/pdf3279.pdf

letsrock

Suitable for Coupe?

PuntoPatrick

2# letsrock


即係時蕉細聲，時蕉大聲？

letsrock

2# letsrock


即係時蕉細聲，時蕉大聲？
PuntoPatrick 發表於 2009-6-12 16:53

According to the literature, you can turn the sound too...
"Triple Fins set at the center of the funnel produces a
dynamic and aggressive sound. An optional special Round
Fin can be purchased separately for sound tuning.
■TripleTriple Fin design produces “Super Sound” "

Simon

Suitable for all turbo cars.

Simon

It is about $1000.

letsrock

It is about $1000.
Simon 發表於 2009-6-12 16:58

so i suppose it can improves the performance during acceleration as the pressure lost would be minimized when changing gears?  (Sorry, i am a mechanic idiot) Good bor.....tempted.

PuntoPatrick

everybody said circulation type is better for acceleration

Simon

Patrick is correct.
Just because the the air pressure lost is minimum in recirculation type.
This HKS blow-off valve is dump-to-air type, if the dump to air quantity is not adjustable, it is not good. But since, this HKS SQV has 2 level of dump to air, it seems to compromise the sound and the performance.
So, I want to know if anyone has a field test report.

古惑強

Just use a re-circulation type, simple & easy!

letsrock

...i am lost.

古惑強

This HKS SQV blow off valve is a "dump to air type" of dump valve, while coupe is designed to use re-circulation dump valve, so what is the point to alter the original design when there is no additional benefit, extra $$$ expenditure plus the "Pisssss" sound, that's all...................

letsrock

This HKS SQV blow off valve is a "dump to air type" of dump valve, while coupe is designed to use re-circulation dump valve, so what is the poin to alter the original design when there is no additiona ...
古惑強 發表於 2009-6-12 18:06

That explains everything, many thanks.