2013 F1

本帖最後由古惑強於 2010-9-14 00:26 編輯

New regulations for 2013 F1 Engine

1600cc 4 cylinder turbo, max 10,000rpm - approx. 650bhp
Kers - approx. 150bhp

Ground Effect will be re-introduced!

http://en.espnf1.com/f1/motorsport/story/27521.html

快意會員

Rank: 10

2^#

AbarthJoe發表於 2010-9-14 00:05 | 只看該作者

This just recall my memory... long time ago, BMW M10 1.5L Turbo engine output approx 1500hp.

TOP

快意會員

Rank: 10

3^#

古惑強發表於 2010-9-14 00:24 | 只看該作者

Yes, indeed. The cylinder block came from the ordinary 4 cylinder BMW street engine! Virtually all other teams use V6 at that time! Ford invested millions $$$ to develop a V6 twin turbo for just 1 seasons, which was completely crazy! There was a TV documentary program that followed the Ford F1 Engine development at that time, and a brief comparison was made against the BMW 4 cylinder F1 turbo engine! I was at early 20s and was totally fascinated by all these technologies, put in a couple of job applications to Rover and Ford but were never selected.

TOP

快意會員

Rank: 10

4^#

古惑強發表於 2010-9-14 01:04 | 只看該作者

This was the original Equinox - Turbo TV programs, still trying to find a free D/L link!

http://ftvdb.bfi.org.uk/sift/title/377461

TOP

快意會員

Rank: 10

5^#

古惑強發表於 2010-9-14 07:15 | 只看該作者

http://rapidshare.com/files/1688 ... GP_-_part_2.avi.001

http://rapidshare.com/files/1689 ... GP_-_part_2.avi.002

http://rapidshare.com/files/1689 ... GP_-_part_2.avi.003

Use HJsplit to join them together for viewing.

TOP

快意會員

Rank: 10

6^#

古惑強發表於 2010-9-14 07:16 | 只看該作者

http://rapidshare.com/files/1662 ... GP_-_part_1.avi.001

http://rapidshare.com/files/1664 ... GP_-_part_1.avi.002

http://rapidshare.com/files/1663 ... GP_-_part_1.avi.003

Once again use HJ Split to join them together for viewing.

TOP

快意會員

Rank: 10

7^#

古惑強發表於 2010-9-17 01:54 | 只看該作者

Luca Marmorini, head motorist of Ferrari said to autosprint that Ferrari has a different proposal regarding the new engine regulations.
What Ferrari suggests is to adopt a 1800cc V6 cutting a section of 2 cylinders equivalnt from the current engines. The explanation is in cost reduction as the new V6 would be derived by the current engines while a brand new turbo engine would rocket research and development costs.

TOP